Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
146-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

146-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971606 50.865023)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971535 50.865015,-0.971539 50.865029,-0.971548 50.865042,-0.971564 50.865052,-0.971583 50.865059,-0.971605 50.865061,-0.971627 50.865059,-0.971647 50.865053,-0.971663 50.865043,-0.971674 50.865031,-0.971677 50.865017,-0.971674 50.865003,-0.971664 50.864990,-0.971649 50.864980,-0.971629 50.864974,-0.971607 50.864971,-0.971585 50.864973,-0.971565 50.864979,-0.971550 50.864989,-0.971539 50.865002,-0.971535 50.865015)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL